<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE7 parallel with IE6 (on XP anyway)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/</link>
	<description>Living life on the vertices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: atylmo</title>
		<link>http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>atylmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atylmo.wordpress.com/?p=1020#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Sorry for being so long-winded about it. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for being so long-winded about it. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atylmo.wordpress.com/?p=1020#comment-332</guid>
		<description>I can see how that would help now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how that would help now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atylmo</title>
		<link>http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>atylmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atylmo.wordpress.com/?p=1020#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Well, when I start IE from the icons in the pic, a dialog pops up saying it’s “Internet Explorer Compatibility Mode”. Yes that is rather unrelated.

It’s probably good for web developers, if nothing else.
It’s hard for web developers to maintain support for IE6 because it was like teh suck at everything ever and needed special workarounds and hacks for a lot of web coding.

But they still need to maintain that support because surprisingly a lot of people still use IE6 — if I’m not wrong it was the last IE upgrade for Windows 2000.

And since web developers need to test new browsers as well as more common older ones, having the ability to have more than one IE version at the same time is probably pretty nice.

Usually, or at least I always thought, that once IE was upgraded two versions couldn’t be used at the same time, or even installed together on the same computer (at least from IE5 up). I’d imagine this made it pretty hard to develop for a browser you didn’t have access to anymore.

Also, having IE6 in general is probably a nice fallback if some site decides to up and choke on you on a newer IE version. I’d say “use another browser” but sites that choke based on browser version also…tend to require IE. Natch.

But like I said this is probably age-old news now; frankly I didn’t want to check and then lose the motivation to post :P I just thought it was cool. 


Thanks :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when I start IE from the icons in the pic, a dialog pops up saying it’s “Internet Explorer Compatibility Mode”. Yes that is rather unrelated.</p>
<p>It’s probably good for web developers, if nothing else.<br />
It’s hard for web developers to maintain support for IE6 because it was like teh suck at everything ever and needed special workarounds and hacks for a lot of web coding.</p>
<p>But they still need to maintain that support because surprisingly a lot of people still use IE6 — if I’m not wrong it was the last IE upgrade for Windows 2000.</p>
<p>And since web developers need to test new browsers as well as more common older ones, having the ability to have more than one IE version at the same time is probably pretty nice.</p>
<p>Usually, or at least I always thought, that once IE was upgraded two versions couldn’t be used at the same time, or even installed together on the same computer (at least from IE5 up). I’d imagine this made it pretty hard to develop for a browser you didn’t have access to anymore.</p>
<p>Also, having IE6 in general is probably a nice fallback if some site decides to up and choke on you on a newer IE version. I’d say “use another browser” but sites that choke based on browser version also…tend to require IE. Natch.</p>
<p>But like I said this is probably age-old news now; frankly I didn’t want to check and then lose the motivation to post <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  I just thought it was cool. </p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://atylmo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/ie7-parallel-with-ie6-on-xp-anyway/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atylmo.wordpress.com/?p=1020#comment-329</guid>
		<description>What point does &quot;Side-By-Side&quot; mode serve exactly? 

Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What point does &#8220;Side-By-Side&#8221; mode serve exactly? </p>
<p>Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
